Global Innovation Policy Center Current Affairs

India ranks 44 in US Chamber’s Intellectual Property Index

India was ranked 44th out of 50 countries in the Intellectual Property (IP) Index released by US Chamber of Commerce. Last year, India was ranked 43rd out of 45 countries in index, with an overall score if 8.4 points.

The index was released as part of annual report prepared by the Global Innovation Policy Center (GIPC) of the US Chambers of Commerce. The report analyses IP climate in 50 world economies based on 40 unique indicators that benchmark activity critical to innovation development surrounding patent, copyright, trademark and trade secrets protection.

Key Highlights of report

The US topped this edition of list with total 37.98 points, followed by United Kingdom (37.97) and Sweden (37.03).  India has increased substantially its score this year. Its overall score has increased substantially from 25% (8.75 out of 35) in previous year to 30% (12.03 out of 40) in latest edition.

Despite improvement in score, India continues to remain towards bottom of ladder. India has demonstrated long-standing and clear commitment to increasing awareness of importance of IP rights and respect for creators and innovators. However, India has long way to go.

India’s ranking reflects relatively strong performance in new indicators as well as positive reform efforts on patentability of computer-implemented inventions (CIIs) and registration procedures for well-known marks. ‘Guidelines on the Examination of Computer-Related Inventions’ issued by India in July 2017 has significantly improved patentability environment for technological innovations.

India’s score continues to suggest that additional, meaningful reforms are needed to complement the policy. Among key areas of weaknesses are limited framework for protection of life sciences IP, lengthy pre-grant opposition proceedings, patentability requirements outside international standards, previously used compulsory licensing for commercial and nonemergency situations, limited participation in international IP treaties and no participation in international PPH (Patent Prosecution Highway) tracks.